|
Eliminates the manpower,
time, and costs of light source replacement
Industry-best lifetime of 40,000 hours achieved with ultra cooling
heads
The biggest issue for the lamp system is frequent replacement of the
lamp light source.
LED system has longer life compared to the lamp system. Replacement
man hours can also be eliminated if you use the ultra cooling head.
The continuously-on lifetime of the ultra cooling head is 40,000
hours, or 13 times that of a lamp system. If you assume "lighting-on
time divided by capacity utilization time" is one-third, a semi
permanent usage of 120,000 hours, or 40 times that of a lamp system,
is possible. That means light source replacement becomes essentially
unnecessary and both the labor hours and running costs of the
replacement work can be reduced substantially.
As for the ultra cooling head, we have expanded the number of heat
dissipating ribs in the Smart Canyon Structure from the existing 21 to
40 by making the housing into a long body. Through effective
dissipation of heat, we have achieved industry-leading long life and
illuminance stability.
Dedicated Jig for ultra cooling heads
Its heat dissipation is even better compared to a conventional head,
so it can be mounted on the customer's existing toolings or on
original toolings of new design. It will allow you to trim man-hours
of LED system introduction.
50 percent
reduction in tact time
High-speed bonding with the ultra cooling head's industry leading
illumination of 8,100 mW/cm²
Improvements in tact time due to high-speed bonding can be achieved if
you use the ultra light condensing head, with 8,100 mW/cm²
illumination, the best in the industry, which far exceeds the average
illumination of a mercury lamp.
Reduces tact time by up to 50% compared to a lamp system when used
with the ultra light condensing head *1.
In addition, when increasing the number of channels in use *2, maximum
illumination will decrease as the number of channels increases for a
lamp system, but the maximum illumination at each head won't decrease
even if the number of channels increases on an LED system and
productive UV adhesion is possible.
*1.Compared with mercury lamp system
*2.When fiber branching is used
Uses UIT-150 UV Light Integrating Actinometer manufactured by Ushio
Inc.
When measured at suggested work distance.
Lamp system value is an example with a typical fiber.
Environmentally
safe
Substantially reduces CO2 emissions in power-saving LED system usage
High power consumption and disposal of the mercury lamps that occurs
with each replacement are problems at a lamp system site, but they can
be resolved by using an LED system. An LED system has lower power
consumption than a mercury lamp system, and can also lead to power
saving with efficient use of energy through lighting control. In
addition, the LED light source doesn't use mercury so it is superior
in terms of reduced environmental impact.
*Standard model controller ZUV-C20H
Note: Assumed to be 24 hours and 260 days operation.
Assumes "on time divided by equipment operation time" to equal
one-third.
For CO2 emissions, calculation of 4.1t CO2 reduction with 10,000 kWh
reduction in the Nationwide Receiving End Coefficient published by the
Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan
Power consumption may vary according to device conditions
(NEW) ZUV standard model
[Controller] × [Head unit]
Cost performance that will overwhelm a lamp system
ZUV Smart Curing System achieves a low initial cost level believed to be impossible in an LED
system up to now.
The newly-developed ZUV standard model has made sweeping cost
reductions possible at an initial cost lower than a lamp system.
The cost revolution was made possible because Omron is No.1 in lamp
system replacement and LED system introduction in Japan.
There's no mistaking it. It's an LED era from now on.
*Source: 2008 Fuji Chimera Research Institute publication, 2008
General Survey of Image Device Related Markets
Initial cost efficiency
The basic performance of UV bonding is retained while significant cost
savings compared to a conventional LED system is achieved with
carefully selected features.
ZUV standard model can be purchased at a price below that of the lamp
system.
Beats lamp replacement costs
*1. Comparing the case in which you keep using a lamp system with the
case where you switch to the ZUV standard model
*2. Lamp replacement costs after two years have gone by at a
replacement frequency of about three times a year
If customers who are currently using a lamp system would compare the
costs of lamp replacement, which occurs about three times a year, in
cases where they would continuously use a lamp system for two years
from now on they would find installing the ZUV standard model less
expensive.
On top of that, running costs are substantially nil.
It is characteristic of the LED to have a longer life in comparison
with a lamp system. In addition, for a lamp system whose light source
is unstable, you have to leave its light source on all the time but an
LED system, with its highly stable light source, can be turned off
when illumination is not needed. For that reason, extended use over a
long period of time is possible and running costs can be said to be
substantially nil. Moreover, electricity costs can be reduced by
turning the unit off when it is not illuminating.
Omron's unique head technology
It is a UV-LED, whose characteristic is its long life, but there is a
chance that its life will be shorter if the heat is not properly
dissipated when emitting light. For that reason, it is considered
necessary to avoid rises in temperature during illumination. The
advance that has fulfilled this requirement in a compact head is
Omron's unique heat dissipation structure = the Smart Canyon.
Optimized "New Smart Canyon Structure" (Patent pending)
The Smart Canyon structure has been utilized in all heads in the ZUV
Smart Curing System, but for the sake of achieving low initial cost in the standard
model heads we have optimized this Smart Canyon structure even
further, enabling it to dissipate heat more efficiently.
|
OMRON IA Global
